Tuesday, April 21, 2015
NC Doesn't Want These Midwives
By now, you guys know my opinion on home birth. I would never have one due to the increased risk of death and brain damage. I don't think CPMs should be allowed to practice in any state, let alone North Carolina, since their educational requirements are so poor that they would not be allowed to practice in any other developed country.
Last week, a former CPM midwife spoke out. On her new blog "Honest Midwife," she pulls back the curtain and exposes some of the unethical and illegal practices of the CPM world.
Her name is Leigh Fransen, and she attended a midwifery school accredited by the state of Florida. After graduating she moved to South Carolina and started a successful freestanding birth center in partnership with three other midwives. She left the practice in 2013. After she left, the birth center had three deaths within two years. She wrote of the experience:
"As I drove home, I gripped the steering wheel tightly, my heart racing in my chest. I GOT OUT. It was messy and confusing and ugly, but I was out of there for good. I was relieved, but I wasn’t ready to be honest with the world about why."
"That was January 2013. In April 2013, I heard the first rumors of a baby’s death soon after her birth at the center. In September 2013, news of a second death was splashed across local newspapers. And in January 2015, a third death was reported. My thoughts and emotions ran rampant. One moment, I would arrogantly congratulate myself: No deaths on my watch, and three on theirs, who’s the best midwife now? Another moment, I would wonder at my favored status in the universe, that God had spared me from all the horror, and just in time. And in my most honest moments, I knew the truth of it: I had gotten incredibly, ridiculously lucky. And those three mothers who sat at home with empty arms, they simply had not."
Her full account is breathtaking, and I encourage you to read it in its entirety.
In her account, she describes finally "doing her research" after years of telling parents that home birth was safe.
"I began in familiar territory, the website of the Midwives Alliance of North America (MANA.org). On this site there is a button titled “Research,” and it leads to an extensive collection of the studies that MANA has determined builds the case that nonhospital birth with a midwife is safe...I spent the next several hours using my university library (and helpful librarians) to track down every one of these 24 studies and print them out, filling a large 3-ring binder with my efforts."
"Shades of guilt danced in the back of my head: shouldn’t I have done this years ago? Perhaps before I decided to actually give birth to my own child in a bathtub in a residential neighborhood in Miami? Possibly during my years as a student of midwifery? Maybe before I had assured scores of women that “research showed” giving birth at my birth center was as safe as any hospital? I cleared my head to focus on the task at hand. The research was all here in front of me now. I sat down with my giant binder of studies, a cup of coffee, and a handful of pens and highlighters. I had a long day ahead of me. I began at the beginning of MANA’s list."
She writes about reading each study, one by one, and again, I highly encourage you to read her analysis. What did she find?
"The hours I had spent combing over all of MANA’s best evidence led me to this conclusion: nonhospital birth might be as safe as hospital birth, but likely only in health systems in which midwives are hospital-trained and well-integrated, and where exclusion criteria are strictly observed to permit only the lowest risk women to proceed. Nonhospital birth in the United States as currently practiced is responsible for lower numbers of interventions (such as cesarean section and medical pain relief) but a substantially higher risk of death or injury to the baby."
"Unbelievably, our 'own' evidence, upon close inspection, was almost unanimously against us."
As damning as this is, it is not the worst thing that Leigh Fransen reveals in her account of CPM midwives. The most stunning indictment of CPMs comes as Leigh describes her first-hand experiences at her midwifery school and in the field as a fully-practicing CPM:
"When, as a student midwife, I first participated in nonhospital births, I witnessed some things that made me uncomfortable. At my school, the head midwife would sometimes do illegal vacuum-assisted deliveries. The first time I saw one done I didn’t realize it was illegal, but when I started talking about it freely, I was quickly quieted by the more senior students. “We call it ‘the fruit,’” they said, a reference to the vacuum’s brand name, Kiwi. I rationalized that these other students and midwives would not be using “the fruit” if it was really harmful, so the law must be an unnecessary one. Soon, I was recruited to help usher family members out of the room “so the mother can rest,” as a cover for the vacuum use; I would then lock the door and stand guard. If I was instructed to cover the mother’s face with a cold washcloth “to help her relax,” I made sure her eyes were covered so not even she could see the vacuum being applied. I rationalized that surely she would have given us permission to do this to help her get her baby out without transporting, but that it wasn’t smart to ask permission to perform an illegal procedure. Toward the end of my apprenticeship, I was the one holding the vacuum, applying it to the baby’s head, exerting the carefully angled pressure to help pull the baby down. I rationalized that now I would know how to get a baby out, if I were ever in a situation where there were no available hospitals."
"I did not originally plan to attend a school where I would learn to perform dangerous, illegal procedures; I became complicit through a chain reaction of participation and justification. "The fruit" was only one of many "exceptions" I learned to make; many of these exceptions I carried with me to my later practice. Illicit use of medications, cavalier usage of toxic herbs, induction techniques, pretending not to see a cesarean scar, fudging dates, doctoring charts, “accidental” breech deliveries, cheating blood pressure readings, lying to doctors, ignoring borderline test results, pretending to know answers while furtively Googling, waiting just a little bit longer for baby’s heart tones to improve, purposely underestimating the staining of amniotic fluid, misrepresenting our personal statistics and the statistical realities of our “profession”… all of these practices are endemic to direct-entry midwifery in the United States. I know because I did most of them. I was present (and silent) as others did them. I heard the stories in “peer review.” Not every midwife does all of them; very, very few, if any, do none. It all starts with one small step, and we justify along the way, until we are lost in the woods with no moral compass left to guide us."
Do the lawmakers in North Carolina really want to legalize these midwives, who endemically provide dangerous, unethical, and sometimes illegal care?
Please, if you are in North Carolina (and even if you aren't, but care about the issue), please contact the NC legislators. Tell them you are against the current bills (S542 and 543) that would legalize CPM midwives in the state. You can use my sample email here: Sample Email against the NC "Home Birth Freedom Act."
To read Leigh Fransen's full account, click here: High Risk: Truth, Lies, and Birth
To read Leigh's account in blog form, click here: Honest Midwife
To read some more quotes pulled from the account, click here: Former CPM Blows the Whistle on Illegal Practices at Out-of-hospital Births
To sign the petition encouraging state legislatures to make out-of-hospital birth safer, click here: Protect Mothers & Babies - Make Home Birth Safer.